CCHA Study Sessions, 35(1968), 57-71

The Frenchification and Evangelization of the Amerindians
in the Seventeenth Century New France

by Cornelius J. JAENEN, Ph.D.
Associate Professor of History, University of Ottawa

    There is a traditional and widely accepted distinction between history as past events and history as the study of the human past. Intellectual historians are interested mostly in the ideological patterns and interpretations of the past; even social scientists speak about functioning societies in change. Hitherto the Amerindians generally appeared in our histories in topical considerations of the fur trade, colonial warfare and missionary activity. This paper is an attempt to reconsider the aborigines in a new conceptual framework touching on such matters as assimilation policy, Catholic apocalypticalism and a cultural superiority complex. It is also designed to indicate some relevant and pertinent research from a wide range of intellectual interests and professional insights which is available to the historian. As may be expected, the tentative conclusions advanced herewith run counter to many accepted views. This should stimulate more research and especially more thought. Historians in the pursuit of their craft seek not only new sources but also new insights into well known sources. The hypothesis, for example, that so-called "Indian policy" was based on a common fund of European ideas, not French or English and not Catholic or Protestant, but rather Western European Renaissance views, is worthy of consideration especially by those interested in comparative studies. It should become apparent in this paper that the relationship between ideas and institutions is at the heart of the complexity (and probably the fallibility) of historical interpretation.

    Our study may properly begin with the arrival of some savages, today called Amerindians, in Rouen in 1508 where they were the objects of French curiosity. Shortly thereafter, Jacques Cartier, in a letter to François I, broached the possibility of converting these "gens sauvaiges vivans sans connoissance de Dieu et sans usaiges de raison. ⁽¹⁾ There was no immediate response in France, other than intellectual speculation, to this appeal to impart right reason and right religion. Opinion concerning the Amerindians was quite divided. The school of Juan Gines de Sepulveda, a Spanish jurist, held that the Amerindians merited to be subjugated and enslaved with cruelty, as they were in Central and South America, for their threefold baseness-idolatry, barbaric customs, paganism. Several writers spoke of "des cannibales et sauvages qui n'ont rien de l'homme que la figure." ⁽²⁾ On the other hand, there was the view of the natural savage, the bon sauvage and precursor of Rousseau's noble savage, an untutored, uncultivated, unsophisticated aborigine capable of being civilized; in other words, of a descendant of Adam who was a fit subject for conversion and assimilation into French life. ⁽³⁾

    Henry IV requested missionaries for the task of converting the Amerindians and the Jesuits, who had previously sought permission to accompany cod fishing fleets to Newfoundland, took up the challenge. ⁽⁴⁾ Champlain wrote in 1608 that the savages could readily be civilized and Frenchified and that with the French language they would soon acquire a French heart and spirit. He saw the Amerindians "vivans comme bestes brutes" but was convinced that following the arrival of missionaries they would be "reduits bons Chrestiens si on habitoit leur terre." ⁽⁵⁾ To him Christianization and Frenchification were synonymous. But Father Allouez, writing in 1672, expressed the optimistic view while distinguishing between Frenchification and Christianization:

Le nom de Sauvage fait naître une idée si désavantageuse de ceux qui le portent, que bien des gens en Europe ont jugé qu'il était impossible d'en faire de véritables chrétiens ... non seulement il y a de vrais Chrétiens parmi ces peuples sauvages, mais même qu'il y en a plus grand nombre à proportion que dans notre Europe civilisée. ⁽⁶⁾

    Montaigne had gone so far as to write about the duty of colonizing powers to ""doucement polir et défricher" the natives and enlist their collaboration in the achievement of universal ideals seeing the latter were "nos égaux en tant qu'hommes." ⁽⁷⁾

    Two aspects of the optimistic French view should be identified. Firstly, most of the early seventeenth century travelogues extolled the physical fitness and beauty, the marvellous dispositions, the hospitality and honesty of the Amerindians. ⁽⁸⁾ Secondly, Frenchmen who were very conscious and proud of their cultural heritage found a challenge to elevate uncivilized and brutish men in an uncivilized environment to Christians refined in manners and improved in arts and learning above their natural state, "pour les tirer d'une habitude barbare à une vie civile et commode." ⁽⁹⁾ Louis Hébert affirmed, for example : "J'ai passé les mers pour venir secourir les sauvages plutôt que pour tout autre intérêt particulier." ⁽¹⁰⁾ Sieur de Cobes summarized the situation in 1608 in these terms:

Quant au reste, pour leur façon de vivre, ils sont fort brutaux, mais ils commencent à se civiliser, & à prendre nos mours, & nos deporte mens, ils se laissent facilement instruire à la foy Chrestienne, sans se mostrer trop opiniatres à leur Paganisme, tellement que s'il descendoit ça bas des Predicateurs ie croy qu'en peu de temps tout le pais se rendroit à la foy Chrestienne sans se faire autrement forcer, & mesme que par la le chemin seroit ouvert en tout le reste de l'Amérique pour y faire la conqueste des ames, qui est plus que toutes les terres qu'on scauroit iamais conquester. ⁽¹¹⁾

    These initial French contacts differed from the earlier Spanish contact with the Amerindians in four important respects : first, by the seventeenth century, nationalism was an operative factor; secondly, the zeal of the Counter-Reformation made itself felt; thirdly, the contact now was, for the most part, with semi-nomadic and not with sedentary peoples; fourthly, the pursuit of the fur trade encouraged aboriginal nomadism.

    The French who came to North America were sustained by an idea of order, based as they believed on eternal and immutable religious principles. They found not an empty continent but an inhabited hemisphere and this posed two problems - one theoretical and the other practical. Theoretically, they had to understand this natural man, this savage. Practically, they had to overcome and dominate this man, they had to integrate him into their commercial, political and cultural patterns, into their idea of order. Thus Pierre de Gua, Sieur de Monts, was instructed "de faire convertir, amener & instruire les peuples qui habitent en cette contrée, de present gens barbares, athées, sans foy ni religion au Christianisme, & en la creance & profession de notre foy & religion," instructions which repeated and amplified by the Vice-Regent, the Duc de Montmorency, "tacher d'en amener les nations à quelque profession de la Foy Chrétienne, civilisation de moeurs, reglement de leur vie, pratique & intelligence avec les François pour l'usage de leur commerce." ⁽¹²⁾ Champlain petitioned Louis XIII for financial support for a "seminary," or boarding school, for rearing Indian children who would assist, it was expected, in the conversion of their elders. In 1624 Father Joseph Le Caron observed:

... il faut esperer qu'à mesure que la Colonie se peuplera, nous humaniserons les Barbares; ce qui est premièrement necessaire, leur esprit s'ouvrira & le bon sens dont ils ont le fond: on les policera par les loir & les manieres de vivre à la Françoise, afin de les rendre capables d'entendre raison sur des Mystères si élevez. Car tout ce qui regarde la vie humaine et civile, sont des Mysteres pour nos Barbares dans l'état present, & it faudra plus de dépense & plus de travaux pour les rendre hommes qu'il n'en a fallu pour faire Chrestiens des Peuples entiers ... ⁽¹³⁾

    The Archbishop of Rouen, in baptizing a young Huron who was 16 years old (December 8, 1627) and who had been educated at Notre-Dame des Anges near Quebec, made much of the conversion of the natives. ⁽¹⁴⁾ It is apparent that it was assumed that the Amerindians who were assimilated into French cultural patterns would necessarily venerate the God made in the French image. Assimilation and conversion were conceived as being synonymous undertakings but the Recollets soon were forced by experience to abandon this hypothesis.

    The Jesuits who succeeded them did not profit from the Recollet experience but repeated the experiment changing their techniques only in 1639. Before long several distinctive Canadian innovations were accepted : first, the Jesuits became involved in elementary education; secondly, they accepted girls in their classrooms; thirdly, they co-operated with the secular clergy and seconded the missionary labours of the religieuses on the frontier. ⁽¹⁵⁾

    Religious enthusiasm in France fed the evangelical zeal of these cultural ambassadors in New France. Ecstatic religious zealots of the semi-secret militant Compagnie du Très Saint Sacrement once marched through the streets of a Norman town shouting that the faith had departed from France and that as ""les fous de Jésus Christ" they would go to the New World to rebuild His kingdom. ⁽¹⁶⁾ Most of the Messieurs et Dames de la Société de Notre-Dame de Montréal pour la Conversion des Sauvages which founded Montreal in 1642 were associated with the Compagnie, ⁽¹⁷⁾ as were the Governors d'Ailleboust and de Mézy, Bishop Laval, the curé de Bernières, many of the seculars, Jesuits and religieuses. Dévotisme challenged Frenchmen to realize in America the pure and ideal Christian society. Catholic eschatology conjured up visions of an Indian Israel, of the millenial kingdom or the spiritual church of the mystics as opposed to the corrupted institutional church of the Papacy, and of the Third Age of the Holy Ghost. ⁽¹⁸⁾ Both Bishop Laval and Marie de l'Incarnation saw the possibility of restoring the purity of the primitive church. Some equated the discovery of the New World with the imminent end of the world and the return of Christ. The diffusion of these ideas may be seen in the fact that a fur trader and soldier like Lamothe Cadillac should have believed firmly and written at some length about the Amerindian descent from the lost ten tribes of Israel. ⁽¹⁹⁾

    Evangelical zeal was countered by three forces in particular. Two are related to the basic materialism of the commercial counter of New France - first, the problem created by the numerous Frenchmen who did not practice the virtues extolled by the missionaries; secondly, the few but influential Frenchmen in France, in New France, and especially in the Dutch and English colonies who practised a deviant Protestant form of Christianity. ⁽²⁰⁾ The third counter force grew out of nativistic religious conceptions. The French missionary personally was an enigma, his way of life a mystery, and his doctrine a riddle to the Amerindians. Such concepts as abstinence, celibacy and apostolic poverty could mean little to nomadic tribesmen. Champlain had remarked of them that ""ils croyent que tous les songes qu'ils font sont véritables" and experienced missionaries wrote (in 1670) about "la Divinité du Songe, qui est le principe de toutes leurs erreurs, & comme l'ame de leur Religion." ⁽²¹⁾ It is only recently that the psychoanalytic quality of these symptomatic and visitation dreams has been understood by Europeans. ⁽²²⁾

    Brother Sagard was among the first to express concern about the outcome of the contact between an acquisitive, commercial, Catholic culture and a primitive, semi-nomadic, communal Amerindian culture. He wrote about men ""brutaux, athés et charnels, qui empeschoient la conuersion et amendement de ce pauvre peuple," the Hurons, who by contrast are described as having "l'esprit et l'entendement assez bon, et ne sont point si grossiers et si lourdauts que nous nous imaginons en France." ⁽²³⁾ He had great hope that ""les sauvages mesmes les vacabons s'apprivoiseroient peu à peu" until French traders, described by Father Jamet as "grands Jureurs du St nom de Dieu" and "vivant en un grand libertinage" appeared on the scene contradicting by lip and life the exhortations of the Franciscans. ⁽²⁴⁾ The compiler LeFevre enumerated the ordinary factors to be overcome by the missionaries æ diversity of languages, inter-tribal rivalries, nomadism, nativistic religion. ⁽²⁵⁾

    The French imposed the fur trade on the Amerindians in the seventeenth century but by the eighteenth century the Indians imposed a continuation of this trade on the French as a condition of alliance in the colonial wars. In imposing their commerce the French undermined the communal concepts, the economy and tribal authority of the Algonquins and introduced the debaucheries of the brandy traffic. ⁽²⁶⁾ Such dysfunctional effects as loss of life and property, sexual deviation, and alcohol-released aggression ensued and were accentuated by the lack of adequate means of social control. With the Europeans came new diseases of epidemic proportions, ⁽²⁷⁾ the depletion of game, and the intensification of tribal warfare. Scalping and intensive torture, according to some authors, while they may have had their origins in the cult of the skull and sacrifices to the sun or war god respectively, spread from the Iroquois (when this Confederacy came under pressure from Dutch and French fur trade rivals) to the Algonquins. ⁽²⁸⁾ There appears to be a direct correlation between the presence of Europeans and the introduction of firearms and the spread and intensification of so-called Indian barbarity. Was it any wonder that the Amerindians feared Frenchification and evangelization? Furthermore, in the Indian conception good magic or medicine was a safeguard of the moral order and highly approved but evil magic or sorcery was the source of misfortunes which overtook the tribe and was greatly to be avoided. The association of baptism with death, for example, placed the missionaries in the category of evil workers and sorcerers. This very elementary observation has been overlooked because the bias in interpreting the events recorded in such sources as the Relations has been in favour of the self-sacrificing and courageous missionaries, in other words a European and Catholic bias. This represents a gross misreading of the factual accounts of the missionaries relative to Indian attitudes and beliefs.

    Other aspects of acculturation in the seventeenth century have been misunderstood as well. The coureurs-de-bois, as a new social type, were not long the teenage "interpreters" such as Vignau, Marsolet and Brulé sent by Champlain to live among the Amerindians, to secure their trade and friendship. They were, especially after 1632, family men and adolescent sons attempting to supplement family income. Indeed, the fur trade, illicit in good part, was the real means of subsistence for immigrant families from France and the chief means of upward social mobility for Canadians. A careful reading of the Relations will also indicate that the French missionaries tended to adopt the language, customs, manners, and to some extent shared some of the views, of their aboriginal hosts. A few became as it were religious chieftains among the Amerindians.

    The results of the contact between Amerindians and Europeans involved in the fur trade and carrying trade was even more disconcerting for the proponents of the assimilation policy. Indeed, when it was realized that Frenchmen who came into contact with the Amerindians often adopted the aboriginal way of life, and that the tendency to "Americanization," or adaptation to the environment, was one of progressive barbarization (as evidenced later in the declining cultural level in New France) the missionaries sought counteractive measures. They adopted the segregationist scheme of the Franciscan missionary, Geronimo de Mendieta, which was the source of the reducciones of the Spanish Jesuits in South America. The réserve founded at Sillery in 1637 ⁽²⁹⁾ was the first Canadian version of this segregationist device which has continued in some form to the present day. The reservation system was supposed to render the nomads sedentary, insulate and isolate them from adverse influences, and nurture the "true believers" to become the nucleus of a cell of the New Israel. Even Governor Denonville had some praise for the system in 1685:

Je trouve tout ce que nous avons de sauvages establis dans les bourgades comme à Sillery, Lorette, au Sault de la prairie, a la Montagne de Montreal, tout cela Monseigneur est en vérité tenu dans une discipline et une regle a faire plaisir a voir. Il n'y a pas asseurement de ville et de vilage en France si bien reglé, qu'en tous ces leiux la; tant qu'il n'y a pas d'ivrognes qui arivent de nos habitation. ⁽³⁰⁾

    The missionary Bigot, on the contrary, complained that the reservation or domiciled Indians fell prey to drunkenness and immorality too. What he failed to realize was that the Iroquois accepted alcohol with eagerness, not so much for its taste, but to produce intoxication as a means of stimulating vision experience. At a later period it served as a release for tension, but the dream-making concept never disappeared entirely. ⁽³¹⁾ The professors of the University of Toulouse, in a signed statement related to brandy trafficking which does not seem to have been properly documented, dealt a heavy blow to the partisans of segregation by observing that although some domiciled natives were capable of leading well-regulated lives it was noticeable that conversions were no more frequent among them than among the nomads. ⁽³²⁾ Marie de l'Incarnation noted that the dislocation of the communal life and primitive hunting economy of the Algonquins by the individualistic mores of the French traders was particularly severe. ⁽³³⁾ Their traditional institutions and patterns of living were disrupted before the missionaries could replace the former culture with the more substantial values and attributes of European culture. This has remained basically the "Indian problem" of Canada. It might be added that the fact that the reserves, originally organized to attract the aborigines to a sedentary life in proximity of European settlements, eventually were populated by refugees from the continuing pagan villages and encampments indicates that the mission represented a substitute for the native organization. The involvement of these "domiciled" converted Amerindians in the illicit fur trade with the English colonies suggests that non-ideological factors may have figured in the decision to break with the tribal community and resettle on a reserve. The measure of success of the Jesuits and Sulpicians, therefore, in imposing Catholicism on these reserves was not exactly a case of acculturation but more exactly they added Catholicism to the cultural overlay.

    Did segregation, necessarily imply prejudicial discrimination? Did the French differ from the English or Dutch in their attitudes towards the Amerindians? Had not Cardinal Richelieu proclaimed a certain equality in 1627 in the charter of the Company of New France:

... que les descendans des François qui s'habitueront audit Pais ensemble les Sauvages qui seront amenés à la connoissance de la Foi et en ferrant profession, seront censés & reputés naturels François, & comme tels pourront venir habiter en France quand bon leur semblera ... ⁽³⁴⁾

    There is evidence, nevertheless, that the French discriminated against the Amerindians in matters of precedence, in legal rights, in proprietary rights, in trade, in supplying firearms and horses, and even in consulting them as allies. ⁽³⁵⁾ In considering what fragmentary evidence there is of Amerindian views of the French it seems that the stereotype of a Frenchman was a trader who brought the firearms, ammunition, utensils, knives, liquor and trinkets the natives came to depend upon, in contrast to the stereotype of the Englishman to the south who was a farmer dispossessing sedentary tribes. These stereotypes do not indicate any basic difference in the attitudes of the English and French towards the Amerindians.

    Attitudes changed with the passage of time as the abandonment of miscegenation indicates. Champlain had told the Hurons that if they would accept the Catholic religion brought by the Recollets the French would come to live among them in their villages, would marry their daughters, and would teach them their arts and trades. This was a very natural decision in an overseas base with a preponderance of males; it overlooked completely such elementary consideration as the influence of the mother in the culture of the children. The pious founders of Montreal, in 1642, repeated the expectation that racial inter-marriages would result in mass conversions, a marked increase in the colonial population, and a rapid development of the agricultural potential of the St. Lawrence lowlands. ⁽³⁶⁾ Both Amerindians and French hesitated to regularize their alliances, however. The Jesuits, on several occasions, openly opposed such unions and the state officials kept urging miscegenation but withheld all substantial inducements. Louis XIV instructed the Intendant Bouteroue in 1668 to "employer toute l'authorité temporelle pour attirer les dits sauvages parmy les français, ce qui se peut faire par les mariages et par l'éducation de leurs enfans," because the missionaries held to a policy of "tenant les sauvages convertis dans leur forme de vie ordinaire." ⁽³⁷⁾ However, he offered neither inducements such as dowries or allowances nor a comprehensive policy of assimilation.

    The role of the state may be illustrated from Talon's Intendancy. On his return to Quebec in the autumn of 1670, Talon remarked on the clerical interest in seeking "des nouveaus sujets pour les eslever dans nos moeurs, nos coutumes, notre langue et notre enseignement" and suggested to Colbert that it would be good to sustain this inclination "par deux ou trois lignes exprimant votre approbation." Almost dutifully, the Minister of the Marine replied the following spring with instructions which Talon conveyed to the clergy of the colony:

Travailler tousjours par toute sorte de moyens à exciter tous les Ecclesiastiques et Religieux qui sont audit pays d'eslever parmy eux le plus grand nombre des dits enfans qu'il leur sera possible, affin qu'estant instruits dans les maximes de notre religion et dans nos mœurs ils puissent composer avec les habitans de Canada un mesme peuple, et fortifier par ce moyen cette colonie là. ⁽³⁸⁾

    Frenchification was viewed as a means of achieving the populationist objective of the mercantilists while averting Louis XIV's fear of depopulating France through emigration. ⁽³⁹⁾

    Two possible alternatives to the projected ideals of evangelization and Frenchification has presented themselves early in the seventeenth century. First, the Amerindians might be destroyed as Montaigne had warned. ⁽⁴⁰⁾ Secondly, the French might become barbarized and assimilated into Amerindian society. Governor Denonville reported to the Minister in 1685:

L'on a creu bien longtemps que l'aproche des sauvages de nos habitations estoit un bien tres considérable pour accoutumer ces peuples a vivre comme nous et a sinstruire de nre. relligion, je m'aperçoy Monseigneur q. tout le contraire en est arivé car au lieu de les acoutumer a nos Loys, je vous asseure qu'ils nous communiquent fort tout ce qu'ils ont de plus mechant, et ne prennent eux mesmes q'ce qu'il y a de mauvais et de vitieux en Nous. ⁽⁴¹⁾

    As the French trade and Catholic missions undermined the stabilizing factors in indigenous culture the concept of Amerindians as bloodthirsty, filthy and depraved barbarians replaced the view of the natural savage. Bishop Laval upon his arrival to Canada displayed uncommon concern for the native Christians, preferred them in religious ceremonies (to the consternation of the white settlers), and went so far as to have church bells tolled at the death of an Indian convert, "qui ne se fait jamais à la mort d'un sauvage" observed the Jesuit Superior. ⁽⁴²⁾ To sedentary life, segregated reserves and miscegenation was added the device of integrated education. In practice, however, the religious segregated Europeans and Amerindians in most schools. ⁽⁴³⁾ Within a few years Laval was blessing a "croisade" against the Iroquois as "Turcs" deserving only annihilation, and he eventually excluded Indian children from his trades school at St. Joachim. ⁽⁴⁴⁾ Mother Marie de l'Incarnation supported such views:

On ne les met pas pourtant en la bourgade des Français, crainte qu'ils n'en imitent d'aucuns. Quoiqu'ils soient assez sages dans ce pays, mais les sauvages ne sont pas capables de la liberté française quoique honnête. ⁽⁴⁵⁾

At best the practice followed the maxim of "separate but equal."

    To some extent the policy of Frenchification failed because it was impractical. Marie de l'Incarnation commented as follows on Louis XIV's continued insistence that efforts to assimilate the natives be redoubled:

Si Sa Majesté le veut, nous sommes prêtes de le faire par l'obéissance que nous lui devons, et surtout parce que nous sommes toutes disposées à faire ce qui sera à la plus grande gloire de Dieu. C'est pourtant une chose très difficile, pour ne pas dire impossible, de les franciser ou civiliser. Nous en avons l'expérience plus que tout autre, et nous avons remarqué que de cent de celles qui ont passé par nos mains à peine en avons nous civilisé une. Nous y trouvons de la docilité et de l'esprit, mais lorse qu'on y pense le moins, elles montent par dessus notre clôture et s'en vont courir dans les bois avec leurs parents, où elles trouvent plus de plaisir que dans tous les agréments de nos maisons françaises. ⁽⁴⁶⁾

    The Ursulines had succeeded in training only 7 or 8 girls by 1685 who eventually married Frenchmen and took up a sedentary life in the settlements. Neither church nor state provided sufficient men, money or materials to clothe and house all the Amerindians in European fashion, to surround them with models of French civil life, to provide educational facilities for all native children. These were unthinkable notions in the seventeenth century, but they were nevertheless the logical prerequisites for the assimilation of an entire aboriginal population.

    The policy of Frenchification failed, to some extent, because the Amerindians had a will to survive, they possessed a strong sense of their identity, and they were a self-reliant, independent, self-sufficient and well-adjusted people in the Canadian environment. Sagard had said at the beginning of the century that the Amerindians considered their children wiser and more intelligent than the French, whom they regarded as very unintelligent by comparison with themselves. ⁽⁴⁷⁾ Peter Kalm was to opine in the eighteenth century that although numerous Frenchmen cohabited with Amerindian women and adopted the savage way of life "there is on the contrary scarcely one instance of an Indian adopting the European customs" and that the Amerindians were "too proud" to learn French. ⁽⁴⁸⁾

    Are we to conclude that the attempts of evangelization were any more successful than those of Frenchification? It may be noted that the martyrs included some Amerindians but the saints were without exception French, not even Canadian. Father Lalemant estimated that about 10,600 converts were made in a forty-year period, a number which may seem reasonably impressive but which represented but a small proportion of the tribes contacted. ⁽⁴⁹⁾ About two thousand of these were death-bed baptisms which added little to the influence of the church militant. There were Indian mystics and some of the neophytes practiced self-flagellation as a form of penance (associated in Europe since the thirteenth century with eschatological movements) mingling their blood with their tears during Holy Week observances. ⁽⁵⁰⁾ Nevertheless, there were no Amerindian priests, no Amerindian nuns, ⁽⁵¹⁾ and no Amerindian teachers.

    In attempting to draw together this fragmentary and diffuse information, the conclusion that imposes itself is that the French, as a minority group dispersed over a large territory and less well-adjusted to the Canadian environment in several respects than the natives, were being assimilated all too frequently into Amerindian society. Nicholas Perrot put it this way:

Tellement que ces Canadiens se rendirent semblables aux sauvages dont ils copièrent si bien le libertinage qu'ils oublièrent ce qu'ils [devoient] à la subordination et descipline françoise, et, si je l'ose dire, au Christianisme mesme. ⁽⁵²⁾

    Christianization or evangelization was hampered by the presence of Frenchman, not Frenchification.

    Aculturation, therefore, was often a process of Americanization of European settlers and traders.

1. Archives Municipales de Saint-Malo, Série H.H., Carton I, 1, 13. The arrival in Rouen of the Amerindians is described in Henry Harrisse, Découverte et Evolution cartographique de Terre-Neuve et des Pays circonvoisins (London, 1900), pp. 162-163, citing Henri Estienne, ed., Eusebii Ctesariensis Episcopi Chronicon (Paris, 1512), f. 111.

2. Eméric de Crucé,Nouveau Cynée (Paris, 1623), t. vi, pp. 5-6. M. Menendez y Pelayo & Garcia-Pelayo, eds., I. G. de Sepulveda: Tratado sobre las justas causas de la guerra contra los Indios (Mexico, 1941), pp. 101.105, 151.