CCHA, Report, 25 (1958), 13-22
Some Opinions of Christian Europeans
Regarding Negro Slavery in the Seventeenth
and Early Eighteenth Centuries
John K. A. FARRELL, M.A., Ph.D., F.R.C.S., F.R.S.A.
Introduction
To explore
the mentality of a bygone age is perhaps the most difficult task of the social
historian. The challenge, however, to peer into the minds and motives of
previous generations seeking a key to their institutions and actions can
scarcely be resisted by the incurably curious.
Although the
past forty-four years have seen violence and bloodshed on a vast scale which
grows with each conflict, and have witnessed the ghastly annihilation of human
beings in millions, some of us nurtured in an older, more delicate tradition
are still appalled and intrigued by historical systems which inflicted a loss
of liberty and much misery on fellow human beings. Such an institution was
Negro slavery developed and sustained by European powers in their Mother
Countries and in their overseas Empires from the fifteenth century on into the
nineteenth. We have become reluctantly accustomed in this first half of the
twentieth century to the enslavement of entire populations of Europeans by
Europeans, or of Asiatics such as the Chinese by tyrants of their own race, as
the totalitarian state rises and advances with deadly success.
Horrible as
this fate is, it, at least, follows with some logic from the atheistic
materialism animating the totalitarian state. We are faced with a far greater
puzzle when we realize that the European nations who seized upon the system of
Negro slavery in the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries as a means to develop
their overseas possessions were outspokenly Christian. Portugal, the first of
these powers to utilise the system, joined with Castile and Aragon through the
Middle Ages, and, especially, in the fifteenth century, as the great champion
of Catholicism against the Moslem invaders of the Iberian peninsula. Spain,
whose Empire was long the best customer of the Portuguese slave-trade, regarded
the cause of Catholicism as synonymous with its own ambitions. The Netherlands,
which by the latter half of the sixteenth century, was challenging Portugal’s
monopoly on the West African slave-trade, had largely changed from its
traditional Catholicism to Calvin’s creed, but, nonetheless, considered itself
dynamically Christian. England by the seventeenth century had awakened
sufficiently to the rich rewards of the West African slave-trade to begin a
protracted duel with the Netherlands over possession of the Guinea trade. And
like her opponent, she was a staunch defender of a Protestant version of the
Christian Faith. A complicating factor in England’s religious picture in the
1660’s, when this struggle gained new intensity, remained the Catholic and pro-Catholic
character of the Stuart Royal Family, who had much to do with the formation of
England’s first important slave-trading company.
France, too,
sent her ships on slaving expeditions to the Guinea Coast, and what European
power until the French Revolution gloried more in her role as a defender and
propagator of Catholic Christianity?
The reader
of this part of European history may well ask what provided the rationale which
allowed these avowedly Christian countries to revive a system of forced labor
which had largely vanished from the European scene by the twelfth century, and
which chose for its victims the brown races of North and South America, but
more usually, the black races of Africa.
There is no ready answer. Yet, an investigation of
this historical problem is rich in excitement. Since previous centuries lacked
the blessings of Dr. Gallup and his researchers, to find opinions expressed in
the era from 1660 to 1750 about Negro slavery is no easy task. This fact, in
itself, would seem to indicate a general acquiescence on the part of the
Europeans concerned which accepted Negro slavery as a normal and necessary
method of exploiting overseas plantations and of providing some domestic
comfort at home.
In an effort
to look even darkly into the mentality of this late seventeenth and early
eighteenth century period, we may study some reactions and opinions expressed
by several responsible and observant people of the time: a wandering,
intelligent and immensely human French Dominican friar; an intelligent and
scholarly Dutch official of the Dutch West India Company located for fourteen
years on the Guinea Coast1; an apostolic and fearless Presbyterian Divine, who
had defied Cromwell; a famous Anglican bishop, as well as the judgement passed
on slavery in Catholic empires by a noted English scholar, and in Brazil, by a
noted Brazilian writer.
Slavery in Canada
Most
Canadians are ignorant of the fact that Indian and Negro slavery was a
characteristic of colonial life in Canada both under the flag of Bourbon France
and the flag of Hanoverian Britain. Any denial which a modern Canadian might be
tempted to make would be utterly invalidated by the late Justice William
Renwick Riddell’s classic work on slavery in Canada, contained in eight
masterly chapters of the July, 1920 issue of the Journal of Negro History. Although
it would seem that the difficult individualistic sort of farming peculiar to
early Canada, and the very limited scope of its commerce prevented any
widespread use of the slavery system, yet Indian and Negro slaves did exist
certainly until the early nineteenth century, and perhaps even an unknown few
remained to the very day in 1833 when the Imperial Parliament abolished slavery
in the British Empire.
William
Renwick Riddell, a late Justice of the Ontario Supreme court, in the very early
part of this century became interested in the legal position of the slave in
the British Empire, and in the slow legal steps which eventually led first to a
slight amelioration of his condition, until finally the slave became a thing of
the past. His research led him to a much neglected field of Canadian history
wherein he unearthed a treasure-house of information. As a result, his lengthy
and careful, scholarly articles tell a tale which places Canada of the colonial
period squarely on the margin of the dynamic world of European expansion in
which mercantile economics regarded the trade in Negro slaves as indispensable.
According to
Justice Riddell’s researches the first Negro slave on record in Quebec was
brought there by the first English conqueror of Quebec, David Kirke, in 1628.
This Negro slave, however, remained a complete novelty since it was not until
1688 that Governor Denonville and Intendant DeChampigny of New France wrote to
the French Secretary of State complaining of the scarcity and expense of labour
in the colony. They went on to suggest that if the Royal Government agreed some
of Quebec’s chief citizens would be willing to purchase Negro slaves from the
Guinea Coast in the West Indies as a remedy for the labor shortage which was
bedevilling Quebec. The Secretary of State forwarded the King’s permission but
warned the colonists that the cold climate of Canada might prove dangerous to
the Negroes, and thus cause the experiment to fail.2
Indian slaves are to be found occasionally
amongst the colonists at this period. These slaves were called “panis” – a term
which has an undetermined origin. That such a class existed is recognized by
the Treaty of Peace and Neutrality in America signed at London, November 16th,
1686 between King Louis XIV of France and, his friend and admirer, King. James
II, of England. Article 10 of this treaty promises a halt to any further
seizures of French or British Indians, their property or their slaves. The
slaves of the Indians were obtained in much the same way as were the Negro
slaves of the Guinea Coast: they were prisoners of war. It was these captives
who formed the “panis” class and who sometimes worked for the early French
colonist.3
On April 13th, 1709, the Intendant, Jacques
Raudot, issued an ordinance reminding the colonists of the advantages of
possessing Negro slaves and the savages called “panis,” and at the same time
regretting the tendency of some “panis” to escape their masters because of the
unsettling influence of other colonists who tell the Indian slaves that in
France there are no slaves. The Intendant reminded such early, amateur abolitionists
that whatever the case in France might be, in the overseas French Empire,
slavery was a reality. And to enforce the custom on this point, he enacted,
“Nous sous le bon plaisir de Sa Majesté ordonnons, que tous les Panis et Nègres
qui ont été achetés et qui le seront dans la suite, appartiendront en pleine
propriété à ceux qui les ont achetés comme étant leurs esclaves.”4
Nothing could indicate more clearly the
existence of a slave class, however small, in New France, and the concern of
the authorities to regularize and protect this kind of property. Although there
appear to be no incidents resembling the slave rebellions which occurred rarely
in the British colonies to the south, there were occasions when slaves
expressed themselves somewhat dramatically. A Negro woman belonging to Madame
de Francheville in Montreal set fire to her mistress’s home on the night of
10th April, 1734. In the ensuing fire, part of Montreal was destroyed. For this
crime, the offending slave was tried, and sentenced to death. She was hanged
June, 1734.5
Since with some of the colonists, the
serious nature of the legal bond which kept the slave in servitude meant very
little, so little that they freed their slaves verbally and sent them on their
way, on 1st September, 1736, the Intendant Gilles Hocquart promulgated an
ordinance commanding that the manumission of slaves must be by notarial act,
and that any other form of manumission was invalid.6
With the conquest of Quebec by the British,
the status of Negro and Indian slaves owned by French colonists was guaranteed
by the Articles of Capitulation. The 47th Article stated, that “the Negroes and
Panis of both Sexes shall remain in possession of the French and Canadians to
whom they belong; they shall be at liberty to keep them in their service in the
Colony or sell them; and they may also continue to bring them up in the Roman
religion.”7
Although slavery was ended in England by
the judicial decision of the King’s Bench, handed down by Lord Mansfield, on 22
June, 1772, (Lord Wyndham estimates that around 14,000 Negro slaves were
freed), the decision had no effect in the rest of the British Empire. Emancipation
throughout the Empire had to await the action of the Imperial Parliament in
1833. When, therefore, the War of American Independence drove thousands of
loyal American subjects of the Crown northwards, they brought with them in
some cases their Negro slaves.
Father
Jean-Baptiste Labat
However difficult it is to find opinions
regarding Negro slavery in the seventeenth and early eighteenth centuries,
there are a few sources. One of these is the memoirs of Father Jean-Baptiste
Labat. This French Priest was a Dominican of the Jacobin variety, who travelled
from France to Martinique in 1684. This eminently human Dominican recorded his
experiences in the French West Indies with intelligent observation. As he and
his fellow missionaries landed in Martinique, they saw for the first time Negro
slaves. On his arrival on the 29th January, 1684, he saw many Negro slaves
coming on board his ship, and had this to say about the experience, “some of
them wore a cap or an old hat and many bore the marks of stripes on their
backs. This excited the pity of those among us who were not accustomed to
seeing this sort of thing.”8
It is interesting to note this reaction on
the part of a refined, sensitive priest as he meets for the first time Negro
slaves. He was shortly to become used to this colonial institution, since the
Church to which he was attached on the island of Martinique owned several Negro
slaves. With a sympathetic feeling he mentions slaves and slavery from time to
time in his memoirs. He noted that around 1695 the King of France, worried
about the increase of the mulatto population, imposed a fine of 2,000 pounds of
sugar on the father of any mulatto. The coloured mother and child were
confiscated by the Crown and given to the missionaries who looked after the
hospital. Father Labat claims that this attempt to prevent interracial unions
resulted only in more abortions. And what happened as well was that masters who
became involved in liaisons with their slave women frequently gave them and
their children freedom rather than have them enslaved to the hospital.
Labat has a most revealing passage which
brings out something of his doubts concerning the propriety of Negro slavery. “There
is a very ancient law to the effect that if a man can reach countries subject
to the King of France, he is free. Owing to this law, King Louis XIII of
glorious memory, had the greatest difficulty in the world bringing himself to
permit the ownership of slaves. Finally, he only yielded to the settlers’
urgent request after it was proved to him that this was the one infallible
means to inspire the religion of God among the Africans, and retain them in the
Christian faith which they would then be compelled to embrace.”9
This feeling that slavery was not wholly
consonant with the best traditions of the Mother country shows, at least in a
few people, some slight examination of conscience. Somewhat mitigating the
system in practice were various acts of charity such as the custom for the
priests to give all spiritual services to the slaves without collecting any
stipend. Interesting to note, too, are Labat’s remarks concerning racial
feeling within the coloured races themselves. The Carib Indian considered
himself above the African slave. Reciprocating this feeling the African slave
felt himself easily the superior of the Carib Indian.
Mixed in with the picture of slavery in the
West Indies were the Engagées or white slaves who were serving in the British
West Indies. Labat has a poignant passage regarding these wretched creatures:
These Engagées
are indeed numerous but should not be trusted, as they are poor Irishmen for
the most part, who groan in a very harsh servitude lasting for seven or at
least five years. These unfortunates are as often as not compelled to commence
a fresh period of slavery as soon as they have finished their first term of
servitude, and no matter what pretexts or reasons their masters allege in order
to prolong their bondage, the Judges never question them. Indeed, if this
Island were attacked the masters would have their hands full for these men
would certainly turn their weapons against them and join the invaders if only
to recover their freedom.10
As a frequent
visitor to the British West Indies Labat had ample opportunity to compare
slavery in the British and French possessions. On the whole he felt that the
French treated their slaves better. For one thing he remarked that the
Protestant clergymen in the British possessions neither instruct their slaves
nor baptize them. In fact Father Labat thought that the Negroes on an island
like Barbados, for example, were regarded more as beasts and allowed any sort
of conduct so long as they did their work properly. He thought, as well, that
there were more slave revolts in the British Islands of the West Indies than in
the French. Yet in all fairness he admitted that similar revolts occurred
occasionally in the French Islands. With a remarkable insight into human nature
Father Labat wrote this significant sentence, “It is indeed true that the
desire for freedom and revenge is common in all humanity and to obtain it a man
will commit any crime.”11
The Dominican Friar believed that the
better treatment the French slave owners accorded their Negro slaves sprang
from their Catholic religion, and the restrictions imposed upon Catholic slave
owners by the slave code of Canon Law.
William Bosman
In contrast to the French Dominican Friar
is William Bosman, Chief Agent for the Dutch at Cape Coast Castle on the Gold
Coast, West Africa. He was in charge of the Dutch interests in West Africa for
a period roughly from 1691 to 1705. The book which he had published called, A
New and Accurate Description of the Coast of Guinea divided into the Gold, the
Slave and Ivory Coast, is in reality a series of lengthy letters written
home to an uncle in the Netherlands who was also a director of the Dutch West
India Company. Bosman, who like Labat, was a discerning observer, had something
to say regarding the motivation for Europeans to work and live on the West
Coast of Africa. The motive quite frankly was unabashed greed. He recognized
the terrible fatalities amongst the white officials, but made the philosophical
remark that it is over the dead that men are promoted. He admitted candidly
that it was great riches which urged his people on. “However, the money we get
here is indeed hardly enough acquired, if you consider we stake our best
pledge, that is, our lives, in order to obtain it.”12
Amongst his analysis of Negro life and
customs he remarked concerning their religion that if it were possible for
them to be converted to Christianity, the Roman Catholic religion would likely
succeed better than the Protestant, because of the ceremonies and of the
natural, liturgical rhythm of the Catholic Church.
In his description, which is a very lengthy
one indeed, of the actual operations of the slave trade, he made several things
quite clear. First, the slaves were supplied by the African tribes themselves.
Secondly, when the slaves offered for sale were presented before the fort of
the European company, in this case the Dutch fort of St. George Del Mina, the
slaves were then carefully examined in their completely naked condition by the
company officials and company doctor. Those which were set aside for purchase
after having been bought were then branded on the breast with a branding iron
which imprinted on their flesh the arms or name of the company. This was done
in order to differentiate the slaves from the slaves of the French, English,
Danes and those of the Africans themselves. Bosman notes with ironical delicacy
that the female slaves were not branded quite so hard as the male slaves. At the
end of his long account of the slave trade, William Bosman clearly pondered in
his mind the effect that this description might have on his civilized uncle in
the Netherlands. “I doubt not but that this trade seems very barbarous to you
but since it is followed by mere necessity it must go on...”13
Although Bosman himself seems hardened to
the problems of life on the West Coast of Africa, yet even he seemed to realize
dimly that the slave trade was not one of the better features of European
civilization.
The Rev. Richard
Baxter and Bishop George Berkeley
It is a point well taken in history that
the past may not be judged by the standards of the present. Yet, we have surely
the right to wonder if institutions sanctioned by custom did not have their
opponents even in their own day. Professor Donnan, for example, in a Portuguese
account translated into English, allows us to see that when the first Negro
slaves were brought to Portugal in 1441, the miserable lot of the captives,
shocked after their capture and longing for their home land, presented a sad
spectacle which touched most of the Portuguese who witnessed it. Another
document, written in 1444, acknowledges the reality that people were becoming
accustomed to the sight of slavery, and that the merchants had found it
profitable. Two justifications arose to allay the consciences of the
Portuguese. One was that these slaves were pagan or infidel, and, therefore,
outside the protection of Christendom. Related to this was the consolation that
these wretched Negroes would now be converted to the true faith, and thereby
more souls would be gained for Christ. The second justification came from the
Bible. Erudite ecclesiastics pointed out that the Negro race sprang from the
loins of Ham, who was the son of Noah responsible for his father’s two-fold
disgrace of drunkenness and nakedness, and, therefore, accursed. An accursed
father bred an accursed race destined to serve races which came from the more
respectable sons of Noah.14
Although these points of view prevailed for
centuries with different people at different times, they have always had some
opponents. Bishop Las Casas in Spanish America is an early example. Rev.
Richard Baxter in seventeenth century England is a further example. Baxter, a
Presbyterian Divine, published in 1673 a manual of moral theology in which he
dealt specifically with the question of Negro slavery. This was just one year
after the Royal Adventurers Trading into Africa were reorganized as the Royal
African Company of England, and embarked on England’s first effort at slaving
on a regular and large scale. Baxter subscribed to the ancient notion that a
man may be lawfully enslaved for two reasons: in the event of payment for crime
and for payment of debt. He stated strongly, however, that neither of these
conditions apply to Negro slaves. Consequently their slavery cannot morally be
justified, as he explains, “but to go as pirates and to catch up poor Negroes
or people of another land, that never forfeited life or liberty, and to make
them slaves, and sell them, is one of the worst kinds of thievery in the world,
and such persons are to be taken for the common enemies of mankind; and they
that buy them and use them as beasts, for their mere commodity, and betray and
destroy or neglect their souls, are fitter to be called incarnate devils than
Christians though they be no Christians whom they so abuse.”15
While maintaining that emancipation is the
duty of a Christian slave owner, Baxter was realistic enough to recognize that
few plantation owners would follow such advice. He, then, advised as the next
best thing the Christianizing of the Negro slaves, not so much by preaching as
by the noble, charitable example of the master. He emphasized constantly the
need for charitable and just treatment of the slaves.
His interest in the Negro slaves was shared
sixty years later by Bishop Berkeley, the great philosopher Bishop of Cloyne.
In an Anniversary Day sermon given at St. Mary-le-Bow Church to the members of
the Society for the Propagation of the Gospel in Foreign Parts in 1731, the
Bishop criticized severely the reluctance of the planters in the West Indies,
and on the main land of America, to convert their slaves to Christianity. He
compares the early Puritans to the old Testament Jews in their notion of being
the “elect” or “chosen people of God,” because of the early antipathy of the Puritans
to the Indians. Bishop Berkeley claims that this antipathy was extended to the
Negroes, “with an irrational contempt of the blacks, as creatures of another
species, who had no right to be instructed or admitted to the sacraments.”16
While criticizing such an attitude, he felt
that many planters fear that if they baptized their slaves, they would be
compelled to free them. The Bishop hastened to reassure them, but warned them
that slaves must he treated with justice and charity. Bishop Berkeley makes an
interesting comparison between the British Protestant policy towards slaves
and coloured people and that of the Latin Catholics. “It must be owned that our
reform planters with respect to the natives and slaves might learn from those
of the Church of Rome, how it is in their interests and duty to behave. Both
French and Spaniards have inter-married with Indians, to the great strength,
security and increase of their colonies. They take care to instruct both them
and their Negroes in the Popish religion, to the reproach of those who profess
a better. They also have Bishops and Seminaries for clergy; and it is not found
that their colonies are worse subjects or depend less on their Mother Country.”17
When speaking of mentalities in history
which tolerate or actually cherish institutions now condemned by much of
society, we must examine whether the institution was not merely one amongst
many. Slavery is the depth of servitude. Servitude of various kinds was part of
daily life in European society in the centuries under consideration. England
knew indentured servants, apprentices, different kinds of servants, and knew,
too, that from time to time the barbary pirates carried off European Christians
into Moslem slavery. The pages of the London Gazette in almost every
issue from 1669 to 1672 carry advertisements put in by irate masters whose
servants have run off with livery, gold and “several other things.” The London
Gazette of the week 16th January, 1670, informed the public that those with
relatives or friends who have recently been captured by the barbary Turks could
obtain their release by applying to a Committee set up by the Lords-in-Council
and by paying ransom of Fifty Pounds. For those who had no such well-to-do
relatives or friends, a public subscription was opened. These depredations of
the North African Pirates were not new. Accounts of kidnapped sailors, and of
other Christian slaves are to be found in the pages of Purchas. Even in
Christian countries such as Spain, Portugal and France, and Italian Republics
such as Venice, these were in some cases household slaves, and in all there
were galley slaves.
Some General
Remarks
Lord Wyndham in his book, The Atlantic
and Slavery, makes the point that generally speaking the Negro slaves were
better off under the Spaniards than under any other slave-owning people except
the Portuguese. Lord Wyndham attributes this to the Catholic religion of the
Spaniards, and to the restrictions imposed on the Catholic slave-owner by the
Slave Code of Canon Law. For one thing slaves had the customary right in the
Spanish world to buy their freedom on payment of a certain sum. It must be
remembered that this particular thing was not peculiar to the Spanish world. A
slave woman was allowed under the Spaniards to purchase the freedom of her
child who had been born to her in slavery. Further when a Mulatto child was
sold, the Spanish father was given preference before other buyers. The
emancipation of slaves in the Spanish Empire was an act of piety encouraged by
confessors. “And the knowledge that they could so easily become free, and the
frequency of the occurrence, mitigated their owners’ sense of superiority.”18 With this statement
Lord Wyndham underscores an important ingredient in the psychological relations
existing between Spanish slave owners and their slaves.
A distinguished Brazilian writer, Gilberto
Freyre, in his study, The Masters and Slaves, a study in the Development of
Brazilian Civilization, agrees with Wyndham in his opinion that the lot of
the Negro slaves was usually better in the Catholic Empires, “Yet it was in the
fervor of the Catholic Catechism that the harsher and more gross traits of the
native culture were softened in the case of those Africans who came from the
Fetishistic areas – although to be sure this was a Catholicism that, in order
to attract the Indians, had opulently decked itself out in fresh colours, with
the padres even imitating the mummery of the native medicine man. The Catechism
provided the first glow of warmth to which the mass of Negroes was subjected
before being integrated in the officially Christian civilization that in this country
(Brazil) was made up of so many diverse elements, elements whose force or
harshness the Church sought to temper without wholly destroying their potentialities.”19
Negro slavery which became a part of European economic life from the fifteenth century onwards fitted into a pattern of thought and habit which allowed it to be accepted and which eventually considered it to be indispensable. At the same time, however, it did cause qualms of conscience to some Christians, and the system had its occasional opponents.
1In
1621, the Dutch West India Company was formed with a charter which designated
its territory of operations as the West Indies, New Amsterdam and the West
Coast of Africa.
2Riddell, William
R., “The Slave in Canada,” C.I., The Journal of Negro History, July,
1920, Vol. V, No. 3, p. 263.
3Idem, pp. 264-265.
4Idem, pp. 265-266.
5Idem, p. 267.
6Idem, p. 267
7Idem, p. 268.
8The Memoirs of Père
Labat, 1693-1705, translated and abridged by John Eaden, London,
Constable and Co., Ltd., 1931, p. 30.
9Idem, p. 58.
10Idem, p. 128.
11Idem, p. 128.
12Bosman, William, A
New and Accurate Description of the Coast of Guinea Divided into the Gold, the
Slave and the Ivory Coasts, translated, London, Printed for James Knapton
at the Crown, and Daniel Midwinter at the Rose and Crown, in St. Paul’s
Churchyard, 1705, Letter VIII, p. 108.
13Idem, Letter XIX, p.
364.
14Donnan, Elizabeth, Documents
Illustrative of the History of the Slave-Trade to America, Vol. I,
1441.1700, Washington, D.C., Carnegie Institution of Washington, 1930, pp.
22-25.
15Baxter, Richard, Chapters
from a Christian Dictionary or a Sum of Practical Theology and Cases of
Conscience, selected by Jeanette Tawney, London, G. Bell and Sons, Ltd.,
1925. p. 32.
16Berkeley, George, A
Sermon Preached Before the Incorporated Society for the Propagation of the
Gospel in Foreign Parts; at the Parish Church of St. Mary-le-Bow, Friday, 18
February, 1731, Day of Anniversary Meeting, 1732, London, J. Downing, pp.
19-20.
17Idem, p. 20.
18Wyndham, H. A., The
Atlantic and Slavery, Oxford University Press, London, Humphrey Milford,
1935, Part III, C. II, p. 248.
19Freyre, Gilberto, The
Master and the Slaves: A Study in the Development of Brazilian Civilization,
translated by Samuel Putman, New York, Alfred A Knopf, 1946, C.V.P. 375.